The BlogPatricia O'Conner and Stewart KellermanGrammarphobia.com

The Authors
The Books
Blog
Grammar Myths
Test Your Email I.Q.
Writing Tips
Pat on WNYC
Interviews
Write Us
Links
Home Grammarphobia.com



   
The Blog

July 29, 2010

Should we strike out “stricken”?

Q: Please tell me that someday soon the word “absolutely” will be stricken from the language. Oops! Did I commit an egregious error by using “stricken” in lieu of “struck”? If your answer is in the affirmative, please do not respond by saying “absolutely.” I can’t stand hearing it anymore.

A: You’re not the first reader of the blog to complain to us about this. In fact, we wrote an item a few years ago about the annoying overuse of “absolutely” in place of a simple “yes.”

But let’s turn to “stricken.” The past tense of “strike” is “struck,” and that’s usually  the correct past  participle as well.

But, as Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage points out, the alternative participle “stricken” is used when “strike” has the sense of “to afflict suddenly.”

The usage guide adds that “stricken” is also commonly used (as you used it) in the sense of “to cancel or delete.”

So in the sentence you wrote, either “stricken” or “struck” is absolutely fine!

Check out our books about the English language

Permanent Link



Authors   Books   Blog   Grammar   E-Mail I.Q.   Writing Tips   WNYC   Interviews   Write Us   Links
© Copyright 2003-2010 Patricia T. O'Conner and Stewart Kellerman. All Rights Reserved.
     
Back to Top