The BlogPatricia O'Conner and Stewart KellermanGrammarphobia.com

The Authors
The Books
Blog
Grammar Myths
Test Your Email I.Q.
Writing Tips
Pat on WNYC
Interviews
Write Us
Links
Home Grammarphobia.com



   
The Blog

February 12, 2007

“Fulsome” prison blues

Q: I’m an investment banker who’s driven crazy by people using the term “fulsome” for abundant. Any advice on how to correct them without being obnoxious? Please say something about this during one of your appearances on the Leonard Lopate Show.

A: I haven’t found a graceful way to correct people’s English, so I don’t. I think Leonard once joked on the air, however, that anyone who misuses “fulsome” should be sent to Folsom Prison.

Seriously, the word “fulsome” has been misused so much lately that it may be beyond saving. It’s supposed to mean disgustingly excessive, overly flattering, or insincere. But it’s often used simply to mean abundant, without any suggestion of insincerity or excessiveness, especially in phrases like “fulsome praise” or “fulsome apology.”

Interestingly, “fulsome” didn’t always have negative connotations. The word meant just “abundant” when it first appeared in print back in 1250, according to the Oxford English Dictionary. Over the centuries, it came to mean overdone, cloying, gross, nauseating, disgusting, loathsome, and so on.

A case can be made that the folks who misuse “fulsome” now are simply reviving the original meaning of the word. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, in its "fulsome" entry, appears to take that position, saying such a usage “is etymologically justified.”

But the dictionary recommends using “abundant” or “full” in place of “fulsome” to avoid raised eyebrows or misunderstandings. I concur. Let’s give “fulsome” a rest.


Buy Pat’s books at a local store or Amazon.com.

Permanent Link



Authors   Books   Blog   Grammar   E-Mail I.Q.   Writing Tips   WNYC   Interviews   Write Us   Links
© Copyright 2003 Patricia T. O'Conner and Stewart Kellerman. All Rights Reserved.
     
Back to Top